netplus.ch SA

Higher-level rules (SUISSEDIGITAL)

The association members of SUISSEDIGITAL operate various services (platforms, services). But only services from explicitly listed domains / URLs are in the scope of the Bug Bounty Program. All other domains or explicitly listed services are therefore not eligible for reward and do not fall under the Legal Safe Harbor Agreement.

Found bugs are eligible for reward only once, even if they are found at several association members (e.g. if the same software is in use). For this purpose, the association members report any vulnerabilities potentially relevant to more members to the association for distribution.

By participating in this Bug Bounty Program, Friendly Hackers undertake to document information about any vulnerability found exclusively via the platform's designated reporting form and not in any other places. They also agree to keep the found vulnerability secret for 90 days after reporting it on the platform. Finally, they undertake to upload to the platform any data from customers that they have obtained as part of a bug bounty program and to delete any local copies afterwards and not to distribute them further.

Friendly Hackers commits to not using methods that have a negative impact on the tested services or their users. Among others these are:

• Social engineering
• Spamming
• Phishing
• Denial-of-service attacks or other brute force attacks
• Physical attacks

In addition to the prohibited hacking methods listed above, Friendly Hackers are required to immediately discontinue vulnerability scanning if they determine that their conduct will result in a significant degradation (negative impact on regular users or on the operations team) of the Platform's or Service's operations.

Qualified vulnerabilities

Any design or implementation problem can be reported that is reproducible and affects security.

Typical examples:

• Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
• Cross Site Scripting (XSS)
• Insecure Direct Object Reference
• Remote Code Execution (RCE) - Injection Flaws
• Information Leakage an Improper Error Handling
• Unauthorized access to properties or accounts

Other examples:

• Data/information leaks
• Possibility of data/information exfiltration
• Backdoors that can be actively exploited
• Potential for unauthorized system use
• Misconfigurations

Non-qualified vulnerabilities

The following vulnerabilities and forms of documentation are generally not wanted and will be rejected:

• Attacks that require physical access to a user's device or network
• Forms with missing CSRF tokens (unless the criticality exceeds CVSS level 5)
• Self-XSS
• The use of a library known to be vulnerable or publicly known to be broken (unless there is active evidence of exploitability)
• Reports from automated tools or scans without explanatory documentation
• Social engineering targeting individuals or entities of the organisation
• Denial-of-service (DoS) or distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks
• Bots, spam, bulk registration
• Submission of best practices that do not directly result in an exploitable vulnerability (e.g., certificate pinning, missing security headers)
• Use of vulnerable and "weak" cipher suites/ciphers
• Missing Rate limiting without further security impact